Arctic Cat 400 vs MBK 350 (2015)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Arctic Cat 400stacks up against the MBK 350. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Arctic Cat 400 | MBK 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2015 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 366 cc | 366 cc |
| Weight | 267 kg | 267 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 4.3 L | 4.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Tires | 24/8-12 / 24/10-12 | 24/8-12 / 24/10-12 |
Arctic Cat 400 vs MBK 350 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Arctic Cat 400 and the MBK 350 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Arctic Cat 400 brings its published horsepower in a 267 kg package, while the MBK 350 counters with its own power figure at 267 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: