Arctic Cat Mud Pro 650 vs Can-Am Outlander Max 650 (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Arctic Cat Mud Pro 650stacks up against the Can-Am Outlander Max 650. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Arctic Cat Mud Pro 650 | Can-Am Outlander Max 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2014 |
| Price | $8,799 | $9,799 |
| Engine | 641 cc | 650 cc |
| Weight | 331 kg | 355 kg |
| Seat height | — | 35 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.7 L | 5.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Double disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. |
| Tires | 28/9-14 / 28/9-14 | 26/8-12 / 26/10-12 |
Arctic Cat Mud Pro 650 vs Can-Am Outlander Max 650 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Arctic Cat Mud Pro 650 and the Can-Am Outlander Max 650 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Arctic Cat Mud Pro 650 brings its published horsepower in a 331 kg package, while the Can-Am Outlander Max 650 counters with its own power figure at 355 kg. On price, the Arctic Cat Mud Pro 650 has the lower MSRP.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: