Arqin Metro4 50 vs Beta ARK LC Skull (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Arqin Metro4 50stacks up against the Beta ARK LC Skull. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Arqin Metro4 50 | Beta ARK LC Skull |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | — |
| Weight | 79 kg | 88 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.7 L | 2.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 3.5-10 / 3.5-10 | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
Arqin Metro4 50 vs Beta ARK LC Skull — which should you buy?
Picking between the Arqin Metro4 50 and the Beta ARK LC Skull usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Arqin Metro4 50 brings 3 hp in a 79 kg package, while the Beta ARK LC Skull counters with its own power figure at 88 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: