Azel Sweet 50 vs Beta Ark AC Paddock (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Azel Sweet 50stacks up against the Beta Ark AC Paddock. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Azel Sweet 50 | Beta Ark AC Paddock |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | — |
| Torque | 3 Nm | — |
| Weight | 96 kg | 88 kg |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
Azel Sweet 50 vs Beta Ark AC Paddock — which should you buy?
Picking between the Azel Sweet 50 and the Beta Ark AC Paddock usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Azel Sweet 50 brings 4 hp in a 96 kg package, while the Beta Ark AC Paddock counters with its own power figure at 88 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: