Azel Sweet 50 vs Qlink Star 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Azel Sweet 50stacks up against the Qlink Star 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Azel Sweet 50 | Qlink Star 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | $1,399 |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | 5 Nm |
| Weight | 96 kg | 77 kg |
| Seat height | — | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Azel Sweet 50 vs Qlink Star 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Azel Sweet 50 and the Qlink Star 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Azel Sweet 50 brings 4 hp in a 96 kg package, while the Qlink Star 50 counters with 3 hp at 77 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: