BamX BX150-S Charger vs Kymco MXU 150 (2024)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the BamX BX150-S Chargerstacks up against the Kymco MXU 150. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | BamX BX150-S Charger | Kymco MXU 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2024 |
| Price | $1,799 | — |
| Engine | 148 cc | 149 cc |
| Horsepower | 7 hp | 11 hp |
| Torque | 8 Nm | — |
| Weight | 116 kg | 175 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 19/7-8 / 18/10-8 | 21/7-10 / 22/10-10 |
BamX BX150-S Charger vs Kymco MXU 150 — which should you buy?
Picking between the BamX BX150-S Charger and the Kymco MXU 150 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the BamX BX150-S Charger brings 7 hp in a 116 kg package, while the Kymco MXU 150 counters with 11 hp at 175 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: