Barossa MAM 170 vs Izuka Beast 200 (2020)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Barossa MAM 170stacks up against the Izuka Beast 200. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Barossa MAM 170 | Izuka Beast 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2020 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 165 cc | 169 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 11 hp |
| Torque | — | 11 Nm |
| Weight | 170 kg | — |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 21/7-10 / 21/10-8 | 21/7-10 / 20/10-10 |
Barossa MAM 170 vs Izuka Beast 200 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Barossa MAM 170 and the Izuka Beast 200 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Barossa MAM 170 brings its published horsepower in a 170 kg package, while the Izuka Beast 200 counters with 11 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: