Barossa Mini AK3 vs Cobra ECX50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Barossa Mini AK3stacks up against the Cobra ECX50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Barossa Mini AK3 | Cobra ECX50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 50 cc |
| Weight | 58 kg | 93 kg |
| Seat height | — | 29 mm |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | 1-speed |
| Front brakes | — | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake). No front brake. | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Tires | 45/70-6 / 45/70-6 | — |
Barossa Mini AK3 vs Cobra ECX50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Barossa Mini AK3 and the Cobra ECX50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Barossa Mini AK3 brings its published horsepower in a 58 kg package, while the Cobra ECX50 counters with its own power figure at 93 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: