Beta Ark 50 - Paddock vs MBK Booster (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta Ark 50 - Paddockstacks up against the MBK Booster. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta Ark 50 - Paddock | MBK Booster |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 88 kg | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | 1.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Disc, Ø 180 |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake). Drum, Ø 110 |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 120/90-10 / 150/80-10 |
Beta Ark 50 - Paddock vs MBK Booster — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta Ark 50 - Paddock and the MBK Booster usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta Ark 50 - Paddock brings its published horsepower in a 88 kg package, while the MBK Booster counters with 3 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: