Beta Ark 50 AC vs MBK Booster (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta Ark 50 ACstacks up against the MBK Booster. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta Ark 50 AC | MBK Booster |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 84 kg | — |
| Seat height | 33 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | 1.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Disc, Ø 180 |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake). Drum, Ø 110 |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 120/90-10 / 150/80-10 |
Beta Ark 50 AC vs MBK Booster — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta Ark 50 AC and the MBK Booster usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta Ark 50 AC brings its published horsepower in a 84 kg package, while the MBK Booster counters with 3 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: