Beta Minicross R 12 vs Clipic CJ50 HIT3 Replica Junior (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta Minicross R 12stacks up against the Clipic CJ50 HIT3 Replica Junior. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta Minicross R 12 | Clipic CJ50 HIT3 Replica Junior |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 46 kg | 38 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | 21 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.5 L | 0.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.5-15 / 3-12 | 2.50-16 / 2.14-14 |
Beta Minicross R 12 vs Clipic CJ50 HIT3 Replica Junior — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta Minicross R 12 and the Clipic CJ50 HIT3 Replica Junior usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta Minicross R 12 brings its published horsepower in a 46 kg package, while the Clipic CJ50 HIT3 Replica Junior counters with its own power figure at 38 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: