Beta RR 50 Alu vs Sherco Shark 50 Enduro (2006)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta RR 50 Alustacks up against the Sherco Shark 50 Enduro. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta RR 50 Alu | Sherco Shark 50 Enduro |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2006 | 2006 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Weight | 85 kg | 83 kg |
| Seat height | — | 35 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 80/90-21 / 110/80-18 | — |
Beta RR 50 Alu vs Sherco Shark 50 Enduro — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta RR 50 Alu and the Sherco Shark 50 Enduro usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta RR 50 Alu brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the Sherco Shark 50 Enduro counters with its own power figure at 83 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: