Beta RR 50 Motard Track vs Generic Trigger SM Comp 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta RR 50 Motard Trackstacks up against the Generic Trigger SM Comp 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta RR 50 Motard Track | Generic Trigger SM Comp 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 1 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 85 kg | 115 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 2.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | — |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | — |
| Tires | 110/80-17 / 130/70-17 | 3.00-21 / 4.10-18 |
Beta RR 50 Motard Track vs Generic Trigger SM Comp 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta RR 50 Motard Track and the Generic Trigger SM Comp 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta RR 50 Motard Track brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the Generic Trigger SM Comp 50 counters with 1 hp at 115 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: