Beta Urban 125 vs Kymco K-XCT 125 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta Urban 125stacks up against the Kymco K-XCT 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta Urban 125 | Kymco K-XCT 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 14 hp | 15 hp |
| Torque | 11 Nm | 11 Nm |
| Weight | 168 kg | 163 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.6 L | 3.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc. Wavy |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-16 / 140/70-15 | 120/80-14 / 150/70-13 |
Beta Urban 125 vs Kymco K-XCT 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta Urban 125 and the Kymco K-XCT 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta Urban 125 brings 14 hp in a 168 kg package, while the Kymco K-XCT 125 counters with 15 hp at 163 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: