BMW R65 (reduced effect) vs CR&S VUN PPB Sidecar (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the BMW R65 (reduced effect)stacks up against the CR&S VUN PPB Sidecar. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | BMW R65 (reduced effect) | CR&S VUN PPB Sidecar |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1985 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 649 cc | 652 cc |
| Horsepower | 27 hp | 28 hp |
| Torque | — | 37 Nm |
| Seat height | — | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.8 L | 3.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-18 / 120/90-18 | 120/70-ZR17 / 160/60-ZR17 |
BMW R65 (reduced effect) vs CR&S VUN PPB Sidecar — which should you buy?
Picking between the BMW R65 (reduced effect) and the CR&S VUN PPB Sidecar usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the BMW R65 (reduced effect) brings 27 hp, while the CR&S VUN PPB Sidecar counters with 28 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: