BMW R65 vs Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) (1992)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the BMW R65stacks up against the Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar). Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | BMW R65 | Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1985 | 1992 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 649 cc | 650 cc |
| Horsepower | 48 hp | 38 hp |
| Fuel capacity | 5.8 L | 5.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 4-speed with reverse |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Expanding brake |
| Tires | 90/90-18 / 120/90-18 | 3.75-19 / 3.75-19 |
BMW R65 vs Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) — which should you buy?
Picking between the BMW R65 and the Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the BMW R65 brings 48 hp, while the Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) counters with 38 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: