CCM 644 Dual Sport Trail vs Honda SLR 650 (2003)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the CCM 644 Dual Sport Trailstacks up against the Honda SLR 650. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | CCM 644 Dual Sport Trail | Honda SLR 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2003 | 1999 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 644 cc | 644 cc |
| Horsepower | 53 hp | 34 hp |
| Torque | 53 Nm | 51 Nm |
| Weight | 137 kg | — |
| Seat height | 35 mm | 33 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.4 L | 4.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | — | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | — | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 100/90-19 / 120/90-17 |
CCM 644 Dual Sport Trail vs Honda SLR 650 — which should you buy?
Picking between the CCM 644 Dual Sport Trail and the Honda SLR 650 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the CCM 644 Dual Sport Trail brings 53 hp in a 137 kg package, while the Honda SLR 650 counters with 34 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: