Cleveland Hooligun 450R vs TM Racing SMR 450F (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Cleveland Hooligun 450Rstacks up against the TM Racing SMR 450F. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Cleveland Hooligun 450R | TM Racing SMR 450F |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2016 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 449 cc | 449 cc |
| Horsepower | 44 hp | 14 hp |
| Torque | 43 Nm | — |
| Weight | 120 kg | — |
| Seat height | 38 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 2.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Wave disk with Brembo pump and radia l caliper |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Wave disk with Nissin pump and caliper. |
| Tires | 90/90-17 / 90/90-17 | 120/70-17 / 150/60-17 |
Cleveland Hooligun 450R vs TM Racing SMR 450F — which should you buy?
Picking between the Cleveland Hooligun 450R and the TM Racing SMR 450F usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Cleveland Hooligun 450R brings 44 hp in a 120 kg package, while the TM Racing SMR 450F counters with 14 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: