Clipic Bull 50 vs Beta Minicross R 12 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Clipic Bull 50stacks up against the Beta Minicross R 12. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Clipic Bull 50 | Beta Minicross R 12 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | $650 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 40 kg | 46 kg |
| Seat height | 23 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 0.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.50-10 / 2.50-10 | 2.5-15 / 3-12 |
Clipic Bull 50 vs Beta Minicross R 12 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Clipic Bull 50 and the Beta Minicross R 12 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Clipic Bull 50 brings its published horsepower in a 40 kg package, while the Beta Minicross R 12 counters with its own power figure at 46 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: