Clipic QT9 vs Yamaha BWs (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Clipic QT9stacks up against the Yamaha BWs. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Clipic QT9 | Yamaha BWs |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | $1,290 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 85 kg | — |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/90-10 / 150/80-10 |
Clipic QT9 vs Yamaha BWs — which should you buy?
Picking between the Clipic QT9 and the Yamaha BWs usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Clipic QT9 brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the Yamaha BWs counters with 3 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: