CR&S VUN PPB Sidecar vs CR&S VUN Track (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the CR&S VUN PPB Sidecarstacks up against the CR&S VUN Track. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | CR&S VUN PPB Sidecar | CR&S VUN Track |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2009 |
| Price | — | $19,900 |
| Engine | 652 cc | 652 cc |
| Horsepower | 28 hp | 68 hp |
| Torque | 37 Nm | 65 Nm |
| Weight | — | 128 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.3 L | 3.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-ZR17 / 160/60-ZR17 | 120/70-ZR17 / 160/60-ZR17 |
CR&S VUN PPB Sidecar vs CR&S VUN Track — which should you buy?
Picking between the CR&S VUN PPB Sidecar and the CR&S VUN Track usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the CR&S VUN PPB Sidecar brings 28 hp, while the CR&S VUN Track counters with 68 hp at 128 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: