CSR B09 50 vs TGB Octane 50 4T (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the CSR B09 50stacks up against the TGB Octane 50 4T. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | CSR B09 50 | TGB Octane 50 4T |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 4 hp |
| Weight | — | 91 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
CSR B09 50 vs TGB Octane 50 4T — which should you buy?
Picking between the CSR B09 50 and the TGB Octane 50 4T usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the CSR B09 50 brings its published horsepower, while the TGB Octane 50 4T counters with 4 hp at 91 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: