E-Ton Challenger 150 CXL-150 vs Kymco MXU 150 RL (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the E-Ton Challenger 150 CXL-150stacks up against the Kymco MXU 150 RL. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | E-Ton Challenger 150 CXL-150 | Kymco MXU 150 RL |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2017 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 150 cc | 151 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 11 hp |
| Weight | 172 kg | 175 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.7 L | 2.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 21/7-10 / 22/10-10 | 22/7-10 / 22/10-10 |
E-Ton Challenger 150 CXL-150 vs Kymco MXU 150 RL — which should you buy?
Picking between the E-Ton Challenger 150 CXL-150 and the Kymco MXU 150 RL usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the E-Ton Challenger 150 CXL-150 brings its published horsepower in a 172 kg package, while the Kymco MXU 150 RL counters with 11 hp at 175 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: