E-Ton Matrix R4 150 vs UM Matrix II 150 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the E-Ton Matrix R4 150stacks up against the UM Matrix II 150. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | E-Ton Matrix R4 150 | UM Matrix II 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 150 cc | 150 cc |
| Weight | 113 kg | 103 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 35 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.7 L | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | 1-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
E-Ton Matrix R4 150 vs UM Matrix II 150 — which should you buy?
Picking between the E-Ton Matrix R4 150 and the UM Matrix II 150 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the E-Ton Matrix R4 150 brings its published horsepower in a 113 kg package, while the UM Matrix II 150 counters with its own power figure at 103 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: