Generic Cracker 50 vs PGO PMX Naked 50 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Generic Cracker 50stacks up against the PGO PMX Naked 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Generic Cracker 50 | PGO PMX Naked 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 5 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 5 Nm |
| Weight | 88 kg | 92 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | 1.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/90-10 |
Generic Cracker 50 vs PGO PMX Naked 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Generic Cracker 50 and the PGO PMX Naked 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Generic Cracker 50 brings 3 hp in a 88 kg package, while the PGO PMX Naked 50 counters with 5 hp at 92 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: