Generic Jump 50 vs Hyosung Rush 50 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Generic Jump 50stacks up against the Hyosung Rush 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Generic Jump 50 | Hyosung Rush 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | — |
| Torque | 4 Nm | — |
| Weight | 86 kg | 88 kg |
| Seat height | — | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.50-10 / 2.50-10 | 110/70-12 / 120/90-12 |
Generic Jump 50 vs Hyosung Rush 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Generic Jump 50 and the Hyosung Rush 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Generic Jump 50 brings 3 hp in a 86 kg package, while the Hyosung Rush 50 counters with its own power figure at 88 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: