Generic Trigger X 50 vs Puma Falcon CR50 Cross (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Generic Trigger X 50stacks up against the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Generic Trigger X 50 | Puma Falcon CR50 Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 2 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | — |
| Weight | 96 kg | 108 kg |
| Seat height | — | 38 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.6 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | — | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | — | Single disc |
| Tires | 3.00-21 / 4.10-18 | 80/100-21 / 110/100-18 |
Generic Trigger X 50 vs Puma Falcon CR50 Cross — which should you buy?
Picking between the Generic Trigger X 50 and the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Generic Trigger X 50 brings 2 hp in a 96 kg package, while the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross counters with 4 hp at 108 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: