Giantco Cyclop 50 vs MBK Booster Naked (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Giantco Cyclop 50stacks up against the MBK Booster Naked. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Giantco Cyclop 50 | MBK Booster Naked |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 5 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 77 kg | 267 kg |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.9 L | 1.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 3.00-10 / 3.00-10 | 120/90-10 / 150/80-10 |
Giantco Cyclop 50 vs MBK Booster Naked — which should you buy?
Picking between the Giantco Cyclop 50 and the MBK Booster Naked usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Giantco Cyclop 50 brings 5 hp in a 77 kg package, while the MBK Booster Naked counters with 3 hp at 267 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: