Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli vs Pagsta Wasp 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncellistacks up against the Pagsta Wasp 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli | Pagsta Wasp 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 5 Nm | 3 Nm |
| Weight | — | 80 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 220 mm stainless steel disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 175 mm stainless steel disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-14 / 140/60-13 | 3.50-10 / 3.50-10 |
Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli vs Pagsta Wasp 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli and the Pagsta Wasp 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli brings 5 hp, while the Pagsta Wasp 50 counters with 3 hp at 80 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: