Headbanger Hollister vs Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Headbanger Hollisterstacks up against the Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Headbanger Hollister | Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2014 | 2014 |
| Price | $24,677 | $34,995 |
| Engine | 1442 cc | 1442 cc |
| Weight | 235 kg | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.4 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Beringer 4-piston calipers | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Beringer 4-piston calipers | Single disc |
| Tires | 150/80-16 / 200/60-16 | 120/90-21 / 300-18 |
Headbanger Hollister vs Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger — which should you buy?
Picking between the Headbanger Hollister and the Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Headbanger Hollister brings its published horsepower in a 235 kg package, while the Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger counters with its own power figure. On price, the Headbanger Hollister has the lower MSRP.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: