Highland 350cc Trail vs Husqvarna WR 360 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Highland 350cc Trailstacks up against the Husqvarna WR 360. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Highland 350cc Trail | Husqvarna WR 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2002 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 349 cc | 349 cc |
| Weight | — | 105 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | 35 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | 3.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. 2-piston | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Single piston | Single disc |
| Tires | 110/80-19 / 150/70-17 | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 |
Highland 350cc Trail vs Husqvarna WR 360 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Highland 350cc Trail and the Husqvarna WR 360 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Highland 350cc Trail brings its published horsepower, while the Husqvarna WR 360 counters with its own power figure at 105 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: