Honda CM 200 T (reduced effect) vs Beta REV-3 200 (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Honda CM 200 T (reduced effect)stacks up against the Beta REV-3 200. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Honda CM 200 T (reduced effect) | Beta REV-3 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1986 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 194 cc | 195 cc |
| Horsepower | 10 hp | — |
| Weight | — | 70 kg |
| Seat height | — | 26 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.9 L | 0.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake | Single disc. 4 piston caliper |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Single disc. 2 piston caliper |
| Tires | 3.00-17 / 3.50-16 | 2.75-21 / 4-18 |
Honda CM 200 T (reduced effect) vs Beta REV-3 200 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Honda CM 200 T (reduced effect) and the Beta REV-3 200 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Honda CM 200 T (reduced effect) brings 10 hp, while the Beta REV-3 200 counters with its own power figure at 70 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: