Honda NT 650 V Deauville vs Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) (2001)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Honda NT 650 V Deauvillestacks up against the Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar). Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Honda NT 650 V Deauville | Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2001 | 1992 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 647 cc | 650 cc |
| Horsepower | 56 hp | 38 hp |
| Torque | 55 Nm | — |
| Weight | 223 kg | — |
| Seat height | 32 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 5.2 L | 5.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 4-speed with reverse |
| Front brakes | Dual disc | Expanding brake |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake |
| Tires | 120/70-ZR17 / 150/70-ZR17 | 3.75-19 / 3.75-19 |
Honda NT 650 V Deauville vs Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) — which should you buy?
Picking between the Honda NT 650 V Deauville and the Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Honda NT 650 V Deauville brings 56 hp in a 223 kg package, while the Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) counters with 38 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: