Husaberg FE 390 vs Husqvarna 400 WR (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husaberg FE 390stacks up against the Husqvarna 400 WR. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husaberg FE 390 | Husqvarna 400 WR |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 1990 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 393 cc | 395 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 17 hp |
| Weight | 114 kg | — |
| Seat height | 39 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.3 L | 2.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 |
Husaberg FE 390 vs Husqvarna 400 WR — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husaberg FE 390 and the Husqvarna 400 WR usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husaberg FE 390 brings its published horsepower in a 114 kg package, while the Husqvarna 400 WR counters with 17 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: