Husqvarna SM 450 vs Husaberg FS 400 E (2004)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna SM 450stacks up against the Husaberg FS 400 E. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna SM 450 | Husaberg FS 400 E |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2004 | 2003 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 399 cc | 399 cc |
| Weight | 105 kg | 112 kg |
| Seat height | 35 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.5 L | 2.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/60-17 / 150/60-17 | — |
Husqvarna SM 450 vs Husaberg FS 400 E — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna SM 450 and the Husaberg FS 400 E usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna SM 450 brings its published horsepower in a 105 kg package, while the Husaberg FS 400 E counters with its own power figure at 112 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: