Husqvarna SM50 vs CPI SMX 50 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna SM50stacks up against the CPI SMX 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna SM50 | CPI SMX 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 3 hp |
| Weight | 43 kg | — |
| Seat height | 27 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 0.7 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Fixed disc and caliper with hydraulic control | Single disc. Wave, dual piston |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Fixed disc and caliper with hydraulic control | Single disc. Wave, dual piston |
| Tires | 90/90-10 / 90/90-10 | 180/80-17 / 130/70-17 |
Husqvarna SM50 vs CPI SMX 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna SM50 and the CPI SMX 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna SM50 brings its published horsepower in a 43 kg package, while the CPI SMX 50 counters with 3 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: