Husqvarna SM50 vs NOX KL 50 SM (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna SM50stacks up against the NOX KL 50 SM. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna SM50 | NOX KL 50 SM |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2010 |
| Price | — | $2,490 |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 43 kg | 82 kg |
| Seat height | 27 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.7 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Fixed disc and caliper with hydraulic control | Single disc. 2-piston |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Fixed disc and caliper with hydraulic control | Single disc. 2-piston |
| Tires | 90/90-10 / 90/90-10 | 100/80-17 / 130/70-17 |
Husqvarna SM50 vs NOX KL 50 SM — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna SM50 and the NOX KL 50 SM usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna SM50 brings its published horsepower in a 43 kg package, while the NOX KL 50 SM counters with its own power figure at 82 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: