Husqvarna SM50 vs Adly RT-50 Road Tracer (2018)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna SM50stacks up against the Adly RT-50 Road Tracer. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna SM50 | Adly RT-50 Road Tracer |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2018 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 43 kg | 75 kg |
| Seat height | 27 mm | 28 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.7 L | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Fixed disc and caliper with hydraulic control | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Fixed disc and caliper with hydraulic control | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 90/90-10 / 90/90-10 | 120/90-10 / 120/90-10 |
Husqvarna SM50 vs Adly RT-50 Road Tracer — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna SM50 and the Adly RT-50 Road Tracer usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna SM50 brings its published horsepower in a 43 kg package, while the Adly RT-50 Road Tracer counters with its own power figure at 75 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: