Husqvarna SM50 vs Clipic Bull 50 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna SM50stacks up against the Clipic Bull 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna SM50 | Clipic Bull 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2011 |
| Price | — | $650 |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 43 kg | 40 kg |
| Seat height | 27 mm | 23 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.7 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Fixed disc and caliper with hydraulic control | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Fixed disc and caliper with hydraulic control | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 90/90-10 / 90/90-10 | 2.50-10 / 2.50-10 |
Husqvarna SM50 vs Clipic Bull 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna SM50 and the Clipic Bull 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna SM50 brings its published horsepower in a 43 kg package, while the Clipic Bull 50 counters with its own power figure at 40 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: