Husqvarna SMR630 vs CCM R30 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna SMR630stacks up against the CCM R30. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna SMR630 | CCM R30 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2003 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 600 cc | 644 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 53 hp |
| Torque | — | 52 Nm |
| Weight | 151 kg | 137 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.2 L | 2.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Floating disc with hydraulic control and radial caliper | — |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Floating disc with hydraulic control and floating caliper | — |
| Tires | 120/70-17 / 150/60-17 | — |
Husqvarna SMR630 vs CCM R30 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna SMR630 and the CCM R30 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna SMR630 brings its published horsepower in a 151 kg package, while the CCM R30 counters with 53 hp at 137 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: