Husqvarna TE 610 ES vs Honda XL 600 R (reduced effect) (2003)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna TE 610 ESstacks up against the Honda XL 600 R (reduced effect). Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna TE 610 ES | Honda XL 600 R (reduced effect) |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2003 | 1987 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 576 cc | 589 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 27 hp |
| Weight | 150 kg | — |
| Seat height | 34 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.4 L | 3.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | — | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | — | Expanding brake |
| Tires | — | 3.00-21 / 5.10-17 |
Husqvarna TE 610 ES vs Honda XL 600 R (reduced effect) — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna TE 610 ES and the Honda XL 600 R (reduced effect) usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna TE 610 ES brings its published horsepower in a 150 kg package, while the Honda XL 600 R (reduced effect) counters with 27 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: