Husqvarna TE250R vs Mikilon D92-250 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna TE250Rstacks up against the Mikilon D92-250. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna TE250R | Mikilon D92-250 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 250 cc | 250 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 16 hp |
| Weight | 112 kg | — |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.3 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Single disc. Hydraulic. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Single disc. Hydraulic. |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 140/90-18 | 80/100-21 / 110/90-18 |
Husqvarna TE250R vs Mikilon D92-250 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna TE250R and the Mikilon D92-250 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna TE250R brings its published horsepower in a 112 kg package, while the Mikilon D92-250 counters with 16 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: