Husqvarna WR250 vs Alligator VR 2000 Enduro (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna WR250stacks up against the Alligator VR 2000 Enduro. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna WR250 | Alligator VR 2000 Enduro |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 250 cc |
| Weight | 107 kg | 103 kg |
| Seat height | 39 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.5 L | 2.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Single disc. Bremo |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Floating disc. | Single disc. bremo |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 |
Husqvarna WR250 vs Alligator VR 2000 Enduro — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna WR250 and the Alligator VR 2000 Enduro usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna WR250 brings its published horsepower in a 107 kg package, while the Alligator VR 2000 Enduro counters with its own power figure at 103 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: