Husqvarna WR250 vs Beta RR 4T 250 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna WR250stacks up against the Beta RR 4T 250. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna WR250 | Beta RR 4T 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 250 cc |
| Weight | 107 kg | 117 kg |
| Seat height | 39 mm | 37 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.5 L | 2.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Single disc. double-piston floating caliper |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Floating disc. | Single disc. single-piston floating caliper |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 |
Husqvarna WR250 vs Beta RR 4T 250 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna WR250 and the Beta RR 4T 250 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna WR250 brings its published horsepower in a 107 kg package, while the Beta RR 4T 250 counters with its own power figure at 117 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: