Husqvarna WR250 vs Rieju Marathon 250 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna WR250stacks up against the Rieju Marathon 250. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna WR250 | Rieju Marathon 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 250 cc |
| Weight | 107 kg | 98 kg |
| Seat height | 39 mm | 37 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.5 L | 2.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Double disc. Galfer Wave |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Floating disc. | Single disc. Galfer Wave |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 | 90/90-21 / 140/90-18 |
Husqvarna WR250 vs Rieju Marathon 250 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna WR250 and the Rieju Marathon 250 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna WR250 brings its published horsepower in a 107 kg package, while the Rieju Marathon 250 counters with its own power figure at 98 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: