Husqvarna WR300 vs KTM 300 EXC-E (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna WR300stacks up against the KTM 300 EXC-E. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna WR300 | KTM 300 EXC-E |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 293 cc | 293 cc |
| Weight | 107 kg | 106 kg |
| Seat height | 39 mm | 38 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.5 L | 2.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Floating disc. | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 |
Husqvarna WR300 vs KTM 300 EXC-E — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna WR300 and the KTM 300 EXC-E usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna WR300 brings its published horsepower in a 107 kg package, while the KTM 300 EXC-E counters with its own power figure at 106 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: