Husqvarna WR 50 vs Fantic Caballero Super 6M (2002)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna WR 50stacks up against the Fantic Caballero Super 6M. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna WR 50 | Fantic Caballero Super 6M |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2002 | 1982 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 7 hp |
| Weight | 92 kg | — |
| Seat height | 36 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 3.0 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | — |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | — |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 110/80-18 | — |
Husqvarna WR 50 vs Fantic Caballero Super 6M — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna WR 50 and the Fantic Caballero Super 6M usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna WR 50 brings its published horsepower in a 92 kg package, while the Fantic Caballero Super 6M counters with 7 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: