Husqvarna WR125 vs Clipic Tronic E 125cc (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna WR125stacks up against the Clipic Tronic E 125cc. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna WR125 | Clipic Tronic E 125cc |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2012 |
| Price | — | $1,875 |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Weight | 101 kg | 116 kg |
| Seat height | 38 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 2.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 120/90-18 | 2.75-21 / 4.10-18 |
Husqvarna WR125 vs Clipic Tronic E 125cc — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna WR125 and the Clipic Tronic E 125cc usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna WR125 brings its published horsepower in a 101 kg package, while the Clipic Tronic E 125cc counters with its own power figure at 116 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: