Husqvarna WR125 vs Mikilon D32-125 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna WR125stacks up against the Mikilon D32-125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna WR125 | Mikilon D32-125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 10 hp |
| Weight | 101 kg | — |
| Seat height | 38 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Single disc. Hydraulic. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 120/90-18 | 80/100-21 / 110/90-18 |
Husqvarna WR125 vs Mikilon D32-125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna WR125 and the Mikilon D32-125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna WR125 brings its published horsepower in a 101 kg package, while the Mikilon D32-125 counters with 10 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: