Hyosung QT50 vs KSR Pandora 50 4T (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Hyosung QT50stacks up against the KSR Pandora 50 4T. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Hyosung QT50 | KSR Pandora 50 4T |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2017 | 2017 |
| Price | $1,099 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 4 hp |
| Weight | 85 kg | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 1.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 3.50-10 / 3.50-10 | — |
Hyosung QT50 vs KSR Pandora 50 4T — which should you buy?
Picking between the Hyosung QT50 and the KSR Pandora 50 4T usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Hyosung QT50 brings 3 hp in a 85 kg package, while the KSR Pandora 50 4T counters with 4 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: